The following Chapman and other codes are used:
|
|
|
Iago
| BI | WLS | IR | SCT | LND | CON | DEV | ESS | SFK | NFK | YKS | Other counties | Rest of | |
Iago | 100 | 71 | 5 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 3 | | | | | | LAN 3, WAR 2, SHR 1 | |
There are no entries for Iago in
Iago is predominantly Welsh. It is not found in
Jago etc.
| BI | WLS | IR | SCT | LND | CON | DEV | ESS | SFK | NFK | YKS | Other counties | Rest of | |
Jago | 2370 | 4 | 32 | 38 | 175 | 1304 | 612 | 10 | 0 | 2 | | 0 | HAM 73, | 41 (30 in |
Jagoe | 895 | 0 | 175 | 8 | 7 | 554 | 135 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | | 0 |
Jagow | 18 | | | | | 18 | | | | | | | | 147, in |
Jagowe | 4 | | | | | 4 | | | | | | | | 0 |
Gago(e) | 10 | | | | 1 | 3 | 5 | | | | | | WAR 1 | |
Jaga | 5 | | | | 1 | 4 | | | | | | | | 1 |
Jagoo | 4 | | | | | 1 | 3 | | | | | | | 0 |
Jagos | 5 | | | | | 5 | | | | | | | | 0 |
Jague | 7 | | | | | 2 | 2 | | | | | | DBY 2, STS 1 | 4 |
Jajo | 4 | | | | 2 | 2 | | | | | | | | 0 |
Jeagoe | 10 | | 4 | | | | 6 | | | | | | | 0 |
Jogo(e) | 10 | | | | | 5 | 5 | | | | | | | 2 |
Jugo | 12 | 1 | | | 0 | 7 | 1 | | | | | | HAM 1, WAR 1 | 5, in |
Jugoe | 14 | | | | 1 | | 13 | | | | | | | |
Yago | 3 | | | | 1 | 1 | 1 | | | | | | | 7, in |
Total | 3371 | 5 | 211 | 46 | 194 | 1910 | 783 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | |
The six Bedfordshire entries for Jago are known to be children of Charles and Sarah Jeggo.
The ten in Essex comprise 5 in Greater
Thus Jago and variants are found overwhelmingly in
Conclusions
Now it is time to return to the question of where the name Jeggo might come from.
Reaney's assertion that it is a variant of Jago gets no support from the geographical distributions above. Nearly all occurrences of Jago and variants are in
However, one cannot conclude that Reaney is wrong. It is possible that a Jago moved to Essex and that the pronunciation and spelling changed as a result, to something closer to an Essex name, such as Jeg(g)on. The traditional Jeggo story could still be true. The best that can be done is to regard it as a hypothesis, for which further evidence is required. Much the same can be said about Jégo.
The idea that Jeggo is a variant of Jagger is not a serious contender. It was included because there is uncertainty over the name of one family in Bocking. It seems likely that this family was originally called Jeggo, but for some reason presently unknown to me decided to change its name to Jagger, in fairly recent times, circa 1850 - 1860. Further evidence for this is being sought. Jagger is a distinctive
That leaves Jegon and variants and the many similar names which have been collected together in one table above because their geographical distributions are so similar. Reaney states that Jeggons, Jiggen(s) and Jiggins are variants of Judkins, probably from Jukin. "Jek-un, Juk-in, Jok-in are diminutives of Jok or Juk, a short form of Breton Judicael, with its variants Juk-, Jok-, Jek-, Gik-." Reaney also derives Jekyll and many variants including Jickles and Jiggle from the same name - Old Breton Iudicael. Hanks and Hodges also connect Jeggons, Jiggen, Jiggins, Jiggle and Juggins to Jekyll and thence to Old Breton Iudicael.
On the other hand, Bardsley has the entry:
"Jiggens, Jeggins, Jeggs, Jegen. - Baptismal 'the son of Jegg', whence the diminutive Jeggon. Jiggens or Jeggins is the genitive, as in Jennings, Jones, Williams, etc.. There can be little doubt that the original name was Jackson (i.e., little Jack), which became Jaggin or Jeggin. Jack is found as Jagg in early rolls, and is so styled by the author of Piers Plowman. The surname Jeggins seems to have arisen in county Essex, where Jeggins, Jeggs, and Jaggs are still to be met with."
You pays your money and you takes your choice!
The geographical distribution of the name Jeggo matches that of Jeg(g)on(s) and variants. There is also the intriguing from John Jegon of Sible Hedingham to his son William Jego, which needs further investigation. There seems to be a good case for Jeggo being a variant of Jegon/Jeggon. Nevertheless, further evidence is required.
The possibility of Huguenot origins spans the above considerations. The Huguenot records contain references to
Gegu, Jegu, Jigou, Jego, Gego, Jegut, Gigu, Gigot, Gegot | possible variants of Jeggo, Jiggo, Giggo etc |
Jago, Jagot, Jagau | possible variants of Jago etc |
Gigon, Gygon | possible variants of Jeg(g)on etc |
The Huguenot hypothesis can neither be ruled out nor accepted. Once again, further evidence is required.
The main conclusion at this stage, therefore, is that the history of the surname is inextricably intertwined with the history of its bearers. The origin of the name can only be found by genealogy, by seeking the origins of the family.